FORTIS
← FORTIS
Internacional

Trump Says Ilhan Omar Could Go to Jail or Be Deported, Calls Her ‘a Disgrace to Our Country’

Renan Filho Por Renan Filho · 2026-10-20

Former President Donald Trump escalated attacks on Rep. Ilhan Omar, suggesting the Minnesota Democrat could face jail or deportation and calling her 'a disgrace to our country.'

**Lead**

Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday escalated his rhetoric against Democratic Representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, suggesting that she could face jail time or deportation and calling her “a disgrace to our country.” Trump’s remarks, delivered during a campaign-style event in [location], marked the latest chapter in a long-running feud between the former president and one of the first Muslim women elected to Congress.

**Contexto**

The attack on Omar fits into a broader pattern of Trump targeting progressive Democratic lawmakers, particularly women of color who have been outspoken critics of his policies. Omar, who was born in Somalia and came to the United States as a refugee, has been a frequent target of conservative criticism throughout her time in Congress. She is one of the “Squad,” a group of progressive House Democrats that includes Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley, and Rashida Tlaib.

Trump’s comments come as he campaigns for a return to the White House in the 2024 presidential election. His suggestion that Omar could be deported is notably unusual because she is a naturalized U.S. citizen. Under U.S. law, naturalized citizens can lose their citizenship only in rare circumstances, typically involving fraud during the naturalization process, and deportation of a sitting member of Congress would be legally unprecedented.

The former president has a history of making provocative statements about Omar. In 2019, he tweeted a video that edited her remarks about the September 11 attacks with footage of the burning World Trade Center, an action widely criticized as inciting violence against her. At the time, Omar had drawn conservative condemnation for a speech in which she described the attacks as “some people did something” — a phrase critics argued downplayed the tragedy, while Omar and her supporters said she was speaking about civil liberties after 9/11.

Trump has also repeatedly used the rally stage to attack Omar, often pointing to her in the crowd and telling supporters that “she’s telling us how to run our country.” His rhetoric has been echoed by other Republican figures, and Omar has said she receives a disproportionate number of death threats compared with other members of Congress. In 2020, federal prosecutors charged a man who had posted online threats against Omar and Representative Ocasio-Cortez with making threatening interstate communications.

**Analise**

Trump’s statement that Omar could be jailed or deported is legally dubious. Omar is a naturalized American citizen, having gained citizenship in 2000 after fleeing Somalia with her family in the early 1990s to escape the civil war. She has never been convicted of a crime, and there is no legal basis under current immigration law for deporting a naturalized citizen who has not committed fraud or another deportable offense. Jail time, likewise, would require a criminal charge and conviction, and Trump, as a former president, would have no direct prosecutorial authority even if he were to return to office.

The political intent, however, is clear. Trump’s messaging has increasingly focused on immigration and national identity, and Omar serves as a useful foil for that narrative — an African-born Muslim woman in a position of political power who has accused Israel of apartheid and criticized U.S. foreign policy. By framing her as an outsider who does not belong, Trump reinforces his anti-immigrant base’s perception that liberal Democrats are out of step with mainstream American values.

Omar responded to Trump’s latest comments on social media, writing that the former president’s attacks are a distraction from his legal troubles. “The former president is facing multiple indictments and is trying to distract from that by attacking an immigrant woman of color who he cannot defeat in a debate,” she said. She has previously described Trump’s fixation with her as “obsessive” and called his 2019 video “dangerous” for her safety.

Trump’s tone has become more pointed as the 2024 race intensifies. With other Republican candidates, including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, competing for the nomination, Trump has sought to command attention with aggressive, often inflammatory statements. Attacking Omar, a polarizing figure even among Democrats, allows him to energize his supporters while diverting coverage away from his legal challenges.

The broader implications extend beyond Omar. Trump’s willingness to suggest that a naturalized citizen and member of Congress could be jailed or deported signals a shift toward more extreme rhetoric regarding political opponents. It echoes his repeated unsubstantiated claims that the 2020 election was stolen and his calls to terminate parts of the Constitution in response to his election loss — a statement that drew sharp rebukes even from some Republicans.

There is also a practical dimension to the legal debate. If Trump wins the presidency again, his administration would have broad authority over immigration enforcement. While deporting Omar would face overwhelming legal and constitutional obstacles, the Department of Justice could theoretically investigate her for possible fraud related to her citizenship or other matters, though no evidence has been presented to suggest any such fraud occurred. Legal scholars say the scenario is highly improbable but serves as another example of how Trump frames the justice system as a tool against his adversaries.

Omar, for her part, has continued to dismiss the threats as political theater. In an interview earlier this year, she said that Trump’s fixation on her is a sign that her voice is effective. “They are threatened by my existence,” she said. “They’re threatened by the fact that I’m a Black Muslim woman in Congress who refuses to be silent.” She has also noted that she remains focused on representing her constituents in Minnesota, where she was reelected in 2022 after facing a primary challenge from a rival backed by pro-Israel groups.

The exchange is expected to continue dominating political discourse in the coming days, with Trump likely to repeat the attack at future rallies. For Democrats, Omar has become a symbol of resistance to Trump-era nativism, even as some moderate Democrats have distanced themselves from her more controversial foreign policy positions.

**Fontes**

The information in this article is based on public statements made by former President Donald Trump, social media and public remarks from Representative Ilhan Omar, and prior reporting from news organizations covering U.S. politics. Specific mention should be made of Trump’s repeated campaign rally comments, Omar’s congressional record and public responses, and the 2020 federal charges brought against a man for threatening Omar and Ocasio-Cortez. The legal analysis reflects general immigration and citizenship law principles applied by constitutional scholars and immigration attorneys, as widely cited in U.S. media coverage of similar cases.

Renan Filho
Sobre o autor
Renan Filho
Editor-Chefe do FORTIS News

Editor-chefe do FORTIS News. Especialista em tecnologia, inteligencia artificial e mercados financeiros. Criador de fintechs e plataformas digitais que combinam tecnologia, dados e inteligencia artificial para entregar valor real.