**Lead**
In a growing number of protests across the United States, demonstrators are openly calling for the establishment of a single state encompassing all of historic Palestine, effectively erasing Israel. Chants such as “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” have become commonplace, but recent rallies have escalated to direct demands for “one state called Palestine,” with no mention of a Jewish homeland. The movement, once confined to fringe circles, is now gaining visibility on major university campuses and in city streets, prompting concern among pro-Israel groups and politicians.
**Context**
The traditional framework for Israeli-Palestinian peace has long been a two-state solution, under which an independent Palestinian state would coexist alongside Israel. That vision, endorsed by the United Nations, the United States, and most of the international community, has eroded over decades of failed negotiations, settlement expansion, and political deadlock. In its place, a growing number of activists and organizations are advocating for a single, binational state from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, with equal rights for all — a formulation that would necessarily dismantle Israel’s character as a Jewish state.
This position, once considered extreme, has gained traction in recent years, particularly among younger activists and within the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. However, the current wave of protests — sparked by the latest escalation of violence in Gaza — has seen the one-state demand shouted openly at rallies in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. Videos circulating on social media show crowds chanting “One state, one state, Palestine is our fate” and “No more Israel, no more Zionism.”
**Analise**
The shift from a two-state to a one-state narrative represents a significant change in the public discourse around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For decades, mainstream advocacy groups in the United States largely supported Israel’s right to exist while criticizing specific policies. Today, some factions of the protest movement no longer acknowledge that right at all. This radicalization risks alienating moderate voices and hardening political lines, both domestically and internationally.
Moreover, the emergence of these calls in the United States places pressure on politicians who have historically championed Israel’s security. Several members of Congress have already denounced the chants as antisemitic, while others have remained silent. The Biden administration continues to publicly support a two-state solution, but the groundswell of activism demanding a single Palestinian state may influence the debate among progressive Democrats. If the trend continues, U.S. foreign policy toward Israel and the Palestinians could face new challenges.
**Fontes**
This article is based on reports from major news organizations including The Associated Press, Reuters, The New York Times, and CNN, which have documented protest chants and statements from demonstrators at rallies across the United States. Additional context draws from policy analyses published by the Brookings Institution and the Council on Foreign Relations, as well as statements from advocacy groups such as the Anti-Defamation League and Jewish Voice for Peace.
Por Renan Filho · 2026-10-11